Aleksanian v. Uber Technologies Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT oS gee AR SG □□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee LEVON ALEKSANIAN, individually, on . 4lg FO | behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representative, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 19 CIVIL 10308 (ALC) -against- JUDGMENT UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., ET AL., Defendants. ween eee eee eee eee K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order & Opinion dated March 8, 2021, Plaintiffs’ motion for discovery is DENIED and Defendants' motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED. The case is hereby DISMISSED. See Benzemann v. Citibank, N.A., 622 F. App'x 16, 18 (2d Cir. 2015) (summary order) (concluding that outright dismissal, as opposed to stay, is appropriate where none of the parties had requested a stay), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 618 (2017); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 8, 2021 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: . Deputy LAG