Aleksanian v. Uber Technologies Inc.
This text of Aleksanian v. Uber Technologies Inc. (Aleksanian v. Uber Technologies Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT oS gee AR SG □□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee LEVON ALEKSANIAN, individually, on . 4lg FO | behalf of all others similarly situated, and as Class Representative, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 19 CIVIL 10308 (ALC) -against- JUDGMENT UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., ET AL., Defendants. ween eee eee eee eee K
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order & Opinion dated March 8, 2021, Plaintiffs’ motion for discovery is DENIED and Defendants' motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED. The case is hereby DISMISSED. See Benzemann v. Citibank, N.A., 622 F. App'x 16, 18 (2d Cir. 2015) (summary order) (concluding that outright dismissal, as opposed to stay, is appropriate where none of the parties had requested a stay), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 618 (2017); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 8, 2021 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: . Deputy LAG
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aleksanian v. Uber Technologies Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aleksanian-v-uber-technologies-inc-nysd-2021.