Alejandro v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Alejandro v. State

95 S.W.2d 407

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 10, 1936

DocketNo. 18408

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.W.2d 407 (Alejandro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alejandro v. State, 95 S.W.2d 407 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft, punishment being assessed at a fine of $10 and confinement in jail for ten days.

[408]*408It was charged that appellant stole an automobile of the value of $25 from Josefa Campa. Appellant waived trial by jury and after hearing evidence the judge found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment as heretofore indicated. No statement of facts proven upon the trial is brought forward and no bills of exception are found in the record. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft, punishment being assessed at a fine of $10 and confinement in jail for ten days.

[408]*408It was charged that appellant stole an automobile of the value of $25 from Josefa Campa. Appellant waived trial by jury and after hearing evidence the judge found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment as heretofore indicated. No statement of facts proven upon the trial is brought forward and no bills of exception are found in the record. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.W.2d 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alejandro-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.