Alejandro Sanchez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 3, 2005
Docket13-05-00037-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Alejandro Sanchez v. State (Alejandro Sanchez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alejandro Sanchez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-05-037-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________


ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ,                                                    Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.

______________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 351st District Court

of Harris County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



         Appellant, ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ, attempts to appeal a conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

         On January 31, 2005, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

         On February 7, 2005, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response does not establish (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

         The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.


                                                      PER CURIAM


Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 3rd day of March, 2005.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alejandro Sanchez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alejandro-sanchez-v-state-texapp-2005.