Alejandro Hernandez Jr. v. Alejandro Ramon Fernandez, Jr.
This text of Alejandro Hernandez Jr. v. Alejandro Ramon Fernandez, Jr. (Alejandro Hernandez Jr. v. Alejandro Ramon Fernandez, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ JR., No. 08-25-00188-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. County Court at Law No 3 § ALEJANDRO RAMON FERNANDEZ, JR., of El Paso County, Texas § Appellee. (TC# 2025-CCV00456) §
§
M E M O RAN D U M O PI N I O N
Appellant, Alejandro Hernandez Jr., was declared a vexatious litigant on April 17, 2019,
and is now subject to a prefiling order which prohibits him from filing any action in a Texas court
without first obtaining permission from the local administrative judge. 1 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
Code Ann. §11.101. Despite that prefiling order, Hernandez filed a notice of appeal in this cause
without an accompanying order permitting the filing. Because Hernandez has not complied with
the filing requirements, we dismiss the appeal. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 11.101,
11.1035.
1 OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, List of Vexatious Litigants Subject to a Prefiling Order, Alejandro Hernandez, https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1444722/alejandro-hernandez.pdf (last visited August 7, 2025). Chapter 11 of the Civil Practices and Remedies Code requires courts to dismiss new actions
filed by vexatious litigants when the litigant fails to file an order from the local administrative
judge permitting the filing of the new action. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §11.1035(b) (the
court “shall dismiss the litigation unless the [vexatious litigant] not later than the 10th day after
the date the notice is filed, obtains an order from the appropriate local administrative judge
described by Section 11.102(a) permitting the filing of the litigation”).
On July 22, 2025, we notified Hernandez that this appeal would be dismissed unless he
obtained an order granting permission to proceed from the appropriate local administrative judge
by August 1, 2025. Hernandez responded, moving this Court to abate the appeal to allow additional
time to obtain such an order. Because § 11.1035 is clear that courts must dismiss the litigation
unless the litigant, within ten days, obtains an order permitting the filing, we deny the motion to
abate and dismiss the appeal. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §11.1035(b). All pending motions
are denied as moot.
MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice
August 11, 2025
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alejandro Hernandez Jr. v. Alejandro Ramon Fernandez, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alejandro-hernandez-jr-v-alejandro-ramon-fernandez-jr-texapp-2025.