Alejandro Garcia v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 12, 2012
Docket13-11-00340-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Alejandro Garcia v. State (Alejandro Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alejandro Garcia v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00340-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ALEJANDRO GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Alejandro Garcia, attempts to appeal his conviction for murder. The

trial court has certified that this Ais a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On May 31, 2011, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

Appellant’s counsel did not respond and on August 22, 2011, this Court abated the

case and remanded it to the trial court for a hearing to determine why counsel failed to

comply with this Court's order. On September 23, 2011, the trial court held a hearing

and found that the appellant did not have the right to appeal. The finding of the trial court

and counsel’s statements at the hearing do not establish that the certification currently on

file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be

dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this

appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 12th day of January, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alejandro Garcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alejandro-garcia-v-state-texapp-2012.