Alejandro De La Paz v. Jason Coy

804 F.3d 1200
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 14, 2015·No. 13-50768, 14-10018·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th CiR. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

In the en banc poll, 4 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Dennis, Prado, Graves, and Costa), and 11 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, and Higginson).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alejandro De La Paz v. Jason Coy, 804 F.3d 1200 (5th Cir. 2015).

804 F.3d 1200 (Alejandro De La Paz v. Jason Coy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Leopoldo R. Salas Gayton
2016 WI 58 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2016)