Alejandro Casillas Prieto v. Richard Rene Alamia, Rafael De La Garza, II & (FNU) De La Garza

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 7, 2019
• Docket: 05-18-00111-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Order entered January 7, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00111-CV

ALEJANDRO CASILLAS PRIETO, Appellant

V.

RICHARD RENE ALAMIA, ET AL., RAFAEL DE LA GARZA, II & (FNU) DE LA GARZA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416-02393-2016

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 21, 2018 second pro se motion for leave to

make documentation part of the appeal record. Appellant filed his first motion on November 26,

2018 with various correspondence attached explaining why he failed to serve one defendant at

that defendant’s proper address. By order dated November 28, 2018, the Court ruled as follows:

The documents attached to appellant’s motion are part of the appellate record to the extent they are attached to appellant’s motion. To the extent appellant’s motion was intended to supplement the clerk’s record with the documents, the motion is DENIED.

Appellant states in the pending motion he does not understand “if the attached documents were

or were not made part of the case/appeal record,” asks for clarification, and resubmits the

documents “in the event” they were not “ma[d]e part of the record.” We determine the motion as follows. To clarify, the documents are not part of the clerk’s

record. Although the documents are on file with the Court, they do not constitute part of the

record that will be considered in determining this appeal. To the extent appellant resubmits the

documents, we construe the motion as a request for reconsideration and DENY the motion.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE