Alejandra Zapata, Individually and as Next Friend of Yarely Zapata, Antonio Morales Sr. and Irma Morales Individually and as Next Friends of Antonio Morales Jr. and Miguel Morales v. City of Gonzales
This text of Alejandra Zapata, Individually and as Next Friend of Yarely Zapata, Antonio Morales Sr. and Irma Morales Individually and as Next Friends of Antonio Morales Jr. and Miguel Morales v. City of Gonzales (Alejandra Zapata, Individually and as Next Friend of Yarely Zapata, Antonio Morales Sr. and Irma Morales Individually and as Next Friends of Antonio Morales Jr. and Miguel Morales v. City of Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00065-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
ALEJANDRO ZAPATA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF YARELY ZAPATA, ANTONIO MORALES SR. AND IRMA MORALES INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF ANTONIO MORALES JR. AND MIGUEL MORALES, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF GONZALES, Appellee.
On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.
DISSENTING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Dissenting Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina For the reasons set forth below, I respectfully dissent.
I agree with the majority that appellants have not raised a fact question as to
whether Officer Tunis was responding to an emergency call; however, I disagree that
appellants have raised a fact question as to whether Officer Tunis’s conduct was reckless.
In determining whether appellants pleaded a proper waiver of immunity, we
analyze whether they raised a fact issue as to whether Officer Tunis acted in “conscious
indifference” to or “reckless disregard” for the safety of others when he entered the
intersection on a red light without slowing as necessary for safe operation. See TEX. CIV.
PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 101.055(2); § TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. 545.001. Even taking
appellants’ factual allegations as true as set out in the majority opinion, appellants raise
a fact question as to negligence at best but fail to raise a fact question as to whether
Officer Tunis’s conduct was reckless. Driving through a red light, on its own, does not
raise a fact issue regarding recklessness. See Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety v. Sparks, 347
S.W.3d 834, 842 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2011, no pet.); see also Harris
Cty. v. Spears, No. 14-17-00662-CV, 2018 WL 4571841, at *7 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th
Dist.] Sept. 25, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.). I would therefore sustain the City’s issue and
affirm the trial court’s judgment granting the City’s plea to the jurisdiction.
JAIME TIJERINA, Justice
Delivered and filed the 30th day of January, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alejandra Zapata, Individually and as Next Friend of Yarely Zapata, Antonio Morales Sr. and Irma Morales Individually and as Next Friends of Antonio Morales Jr. and Miguel Morales v. City of Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alejandra-zapata-individually-and-as-next-friend-of-yarely-zapata-antonio-texapp-2020.