Alegi v. Coratti

Connecticut Superior Court

Alegi v. Coratti

13 Conn. Super. Ct. 184

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJanuary 25, 1945

DocketFile No. 64565

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Conn. Super. Ct. 184 (Alegi v. Coratti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alegi v. Coratti, 13 Conn. Super. Ct. 184 (Colo. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant has exhibited the copy of the process served upon him and it appears that the same was not dated. This is the only defect and it is purely a circumstantial one. Otherwise service was timely and the return day proper. The omission of date on the writ and complaint would in no way prejudice the defendant. The body of the writ apprised him of the proper return day of the suit instituted against him.

The plea in abatement is therefore overruled.

The motion for an order of attachment is entirely formal and is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant has exhibited the copy of the process served upon him and it appears that the same was not dated. This is the only defect and it is purely a circumstantial one. Otherwise service was timely and the return day proper. The omission of date on the writ and complaint would in no way prejudice the defendant. The body of the writ apprised him of the proper return day of the suit instituted against him.

The plea in abatement is therefore overruled.

The motion for an order of attachment is entirely formal and is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Conn. Super. Ct. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alegi-v-coratti-connsuperct-1945.