Alec Transport Limited Liability Company and Eduardo Sanchez v. Santander Bank, N.A.
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-19-00344-CV
ALEC TRANSPORT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND EDUARDO SANCHEZ, Appellants
V.
SANTANDER BANK, N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the 348th District Court Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 348-303871-18
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On January 3, 2020, and January 23, 2020, we notified appellants that the trial-court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellants have not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notices, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellants arranged to pay for the clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.
Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: February 13, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alec Transport Limited Liability Company and Eduardo Sanchez v. Santander Bank, N.A. (Alec Transport Limited Liability Company and Eduardo Sanchez v. Santander Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.