Alec L. v. Jackson

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 11, 2011
DocketCivil Action No. 2011-2235
StatusPublished

This text of Alec L. v. Jackson (Alec L. v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alec L. v. Jackson, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

CIVIL STANDING ORDER – GENERAL U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN

1. Conformity to Rules. Parties shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by these Standing Orders. Any failure to comply with any of the rules and orders may be deemed sufficient grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of default judgment, or other appropriate sanctions.

2. Communication with the Court. Parties shall not attempt to make ex parte contact with the Judge or his chambers staff by telephone, facsimile, or any other means but may contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Betty Lee, at (415) 522-2034 with appropriate inquiries (e.g., scheduling inquiries).

All counsel listed on the parties’ briefing must be fully apprised of the status of the pending matter and must be authorized to respond to calendar settings by the Court.

With the exception of discovery disputes (see the Civil Standing Orders on Discovery), or unless expressly permitted by the Court, parties shall not submit letters to the Court, and any communication with the Court must be in pleading form, including but not limited to status reports, requests for continuances, and requests for telephonic appearances.

3. Scheduling Days.

a. Civil law-and-motion calendar is conducted on Fridays at 1:30 p.m. Order of call is to be determined by the Court. Parties may jointly ask for a motion to be considered on the papers, but such requests are not automatically granted. The Court may, in its discretion, vacate a hearing on a motion and rule on the papers. b. Initial case management conferences are conducted on Fridays at 9:00 a.m. c. Further status conferences are conducted on Fridays at 10:30 a.m. d. Pretrial conferences are conducted on Tuesdays at 2:30 p.m.

4. Changes to the Court Calendar. No changes to the Court’s schedule shall be made except by order of the Court. Parties seeking to continue hearings, request special status conferences, modify briefing schedules, or make any other procedural changes shall submit a signed stipulation and proposed order or, if stipulation is not possible, a motion for administrative relief. See Civ. L.R. 7-11. Parties seeking to enlarge a filing deadline by way of a motion for administrative relief are admonished to file such a motion in advance of the filing deadline rather than on the day a brief or other matter is due. Continuances will be granted only upon a showing of good cause, with a particular focus on diligence by the party seeking the continuance and prejudice that may result if the continuance is denied. 5. Chambers Copy. A copy of all documents filed, whether electronically or manually, shall be submitted to the Clerk’s Office in an envelope clearly marked with the case number and “EMC Chambers Copy” no later than noon on the next business day after the document is filed. The chambers copy must be three-hole punched on the left-hand side. Exhibits to declarations must be tabbed.

6. Case Management Conference Statement. The joint case management statement must be filed one week in advance of the case management conference date. The statement must include all elements requested in the “Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.” See Civ. L.R. 16-9. In cases involving pro se litigants, parties shall attempt to file a joint statement; if after due diligence, an agreement cannot be reached, the parties may file separate case management statements, with each statement not to exceed seven (7) pages. Unless proceeding pro se, each party shall be represented at the case management conference by counsel with full and complete authority to address all of the matters referred to in (a) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(c) and 26(f) and (b) the “Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.” Counsel must also have full and complete authority to enter stipulations and made admissions.

7. Motions. All declarations shall be filed as separate documents. Tabs must be used for exhibits attached to declarations, including chambers copies.

8. Discovery and Discovery Motions. See the “Civil Standing Orders on Discovery.”

9. Motions for Summary Judgment. Each party or side is limited to filing one summary judgment motion. Any party wishing to exceed this limit must request leave of the Court. Briefing shall comply with Civil Local Rules 7-2 through 7-5. Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered by the Court. Joint statements of undisputed facts are not required, but are helpful if agreed upon.

10. Proposed Orders Required. Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve a proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision. The proposed order should be filed at the same time as the motion or opposition.

11. Grounds for Recusal. Parties are directed to inform the Court of any and all reasonable bases for recusal at the earliest possible date. 12. Service of Standing Orders. Plaintiff (or in the case of removed cases, any removing defendant) is directed to serve copies of: (1) this standing order, (2) this Court’s “Civil Standing Order on Discovery,” and (3) the “Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case Management Statement” at once upon all parties to the action, and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 5. The plaintiff (or in the case of removed cases, any removing defendant) shall also file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-6(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge CIVIL STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN

These Standing Orders on Discovery are a supplement to this Court’s “Civil Standing Orders – General.”

These Standing Orders apply only to cases in which discovery is supervised by this Court rather than the magistrate judge. The Court, at its discretion, may elect to transfer discovery matters to a magistrate judge or a special master.

1. Conformity to Rules. Parties shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by these Standing Orders. Any failure to comply with any of the rules and orders may be deemed sufficient grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of default judgment, or other appropriate sanctions.

2. Production of Documents.

a. Responses. In responding to requests for production of documents, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, a party shall affirmatively state in a written response the full extent to which the party will produce materials. In addition, the party shall, promptly after the production, confirm in writing that the party has produced all such materials so described that have been located after a diligent search of all locations where such materials might plausibly be found.

3. Depositions.

a. Scheduling. The parties shall comply with Civ. L.R. 30-1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alec L. v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alec-l-v-jackson-dcd-2011.