Alec J. Megibow v. Clerk of the United States Tax Court, Docket No. 04-6204 Cv

432 F.3d 387, 96 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7507, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28271
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 21, 2005
Docket387
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 432 F.3d 387 (Alec J. Megibow v. Clerk of the United States Tax Court, Docket No. 04-6204 Cv) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alec J. Megibow v. Clerk of the United States Tax Court, Docket No. 04-6204 Cv, 432 F.3d 387, 96 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7507, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28271 (2d Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the issue of whether the United States Tax Court (“Tax Court”), established by the Tax Reform Act of 1969, 26 U.S.C. § 7441, 1 is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 — or whether it qualifies as a court of the United States, and is therefore expressly outside the ambit of FOIA. See 5 U.S.C. § 551(1)(B) (excluding from FOIA “the courts of the United States”). The question is one of first instance, and heretofore has not been addressed by us. 2 The district court below *388 (Lynch, /.), in a thorough and well-reasoned opinion, concluded that the Tax Court is, in fact, a court for the purposes of FOIA. Accordingly, it held that FOIA could not be applied to the Tax Court. We affirm for the reasons given by the district court.

We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments and find them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is hereby Affirmed.

1

. "There is hereby established, under article I of the Constitution of the United States, a court of record to be known as the United States Tax Court. The members of the Tax Court shall be the chief judge and the judges of the Tax Court.” 26 U.S.C. § 7441.

2

. Among the federal courts, only the District Court of Montana has previously considered the issue. It concluded, as we do, that the Tax Court is not subject to FOIA, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision in an unpublished summary order. See Ostheimer v. Chumbley, 498 F.Supp. 890, 892 (D.Mont. 1980), aff'd, 746 F.2d 1487 (9th Cir.1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noe v. Ray Realty
S.D. New York, 2020
Battat v. Comm'r
148 T.C. No. 2 (U.S. Tax Court, 2017)
Byers v. United States Tax Court
211 F. Supp. 3d 240 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Peter Kuretski v. Commissioner of IRS
755 F.3d 929 (D.C. Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
432 F.3d 387, 96 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7507, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alec-j-megibow-v-clerk-of-the-united-states-tax-court-docket-no-04-6204-ca2-2005.