Alea London Ltd. v. Skeeter's 19th Hole, 2007-G-2803 (11-9-2007)
This text of 2007 Ohio 6013 (Alea London Ltd. v. Skeeter's 19th Hole, 2007-G-2803 (11-9-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} This case stems from a declaratory judgment action in the trial court brought by appellant. In the September 13, 2007 entry, the trial court overruled a motion for summary judgment filed by appellant.
{¶ 3} Section
{¶ 4} Generally, a trial court does not fulfill its function in a declaratory judgment action when it disposes of the issues by journalizing an entry merely sustaining or overruling a motion for summary judgment without setting forth any construction of the document under consideration. Nickschinski v. Sentry Ins. Co. (1993), *Page 3
{¶ 5} Based upon the foregoing analysis, this appeal is dismissed due to lack of a final appealable order.
{¶ 6} Appeal dismissed.
*Page 1COLLEEN MARY OTOOLE, J., TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2007 Ohio 6013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alea-london-ltd-v-skeeters-19th-hole-2007-g-2803-11-9-2007-ohioctapp-2007.