Ale v. Peter E. Reid Stevedoring, Inc.

High Court of American Samoa

Ale v. Peter E. Reid Stevedoring, Inc.

1 Am. Samoa 3d 3

High Court of American Samoa·Decided April 9, 1997·No. AP No. 19-95·Published

Opinion

RICHMOND, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from an order on remand of the trial court. The trial court held that the appellant had failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that appellees had caused appellant's personal injury. The facts are fully set forth in the trial court's "Opinion and Order on Remand."

The judgment of the trial court on remand is affirmed for the reasons and on the grounds set forth in its "Opinion and Order on Remand."

It is so Ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICHMOND, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from an order on remand of the trial court. The trial court held that the appellant had failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that appellees had caused appellant's personal injury. The facts are fully set forth in the trial court's "Opinion and Order on Remand."

The judgment of the trial court on remand is affirmed for the reasons and on the grounds set forth in its "Opinion and Order on Remand."

It is so Ordered.

Ale v. Peter E. Reid Stevedoring, Inc., 1 Am. Samoa 3d 3 (amsamoa 1997).

Pincite

1 Am. Samoa 3d 3 (Ale v. Peter E. Reid Stevedoring, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.