Ale Andre, LLC, Fernando Solloa, Ricardo Backal, Pablo Kuri Fernandez, and Oscar Esquivel Garza v. San Antonio National Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 2, 2012
Docket13-10-00387-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ale Andre, LLC, Fernando Solloa, Ricardo Backal, Pablo Kuri Fernandez, and Oscar Esquivel Garza v. San Antonio National Bank (Ale Andre, LLC, Fernando Solloa, Ricardo Backal, Pablo Kuri Fernandez, and Oscar Esquivel Garza v. San Antonio National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ale Andre, LLC, Fernando Solloa, Ricardo Backal, Pablo Kuri Fernandez, and Oscar Esquivel Garza v. San Antonio National Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00387-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ALE ANDRE, LLC, FERNANDO SOLLOA, RICARDO BACKAL, PABLO KURI FERNANDEZ AND OSCAR ESQUIVEL GARZA, Appellants,

v.

SAN ANTONIO NATIONAL BANK, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Ale Andre, LLC, Fernando Solloa, Ricardo Backal, Pablo Kuri

Fernandez, and Oscar Esquivel Garza, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by

the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-09-3668-D(1). Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on

grounds that the parties have reached a settlement of the claims and causes of action

between them. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal with prejudice to

the refiling of same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the unopposed motion to

dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). The unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the

appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 2nd day of February, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ale Andre, LLC, Fernando Solloa, Ricardo Backal, Pablo Kuri Fernandez, and Oscar Esquivel Garza v. San Antonio National Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ale-andre-llc-fernando-solloa-ricardo-backal-pablo-texapp-2012.