Aldublin-Robleto v. FCC II Butner

630 F. App'x 208
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 19, 2016·No. No. 15-7251·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danilo Aldublin-Robleto appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Aldublin-Robleto v. FCC II Butner, No. 5:15-ct-03026-FL, 2015 WL 4459493 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2015). We deny Aldublin-Robleto’s motion for entry of final judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aldublin-Robleto v. FCC II Butner, 630 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2016).

630 F. App'x 208 (Aldublin-Robleto v. FCC II Butner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 2671-2680
28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680
§ 2671
28 U.S.C. § 2671