Aldublin-Robleto v. FCC II Butner

630 F. App'x 208
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7251
StatusPublished

This text of 630 F. App'x 208 (Aldublin-Robleto v. FCC II Butner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aldublin-Robleto v. FCC II Butner, 630 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danilo Aldublin-Robleto appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Aldublin-Robleto v. FCC II Butner, No. 5:15-ct-03026-FL, 2015 WL 4459493 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2015). We deny Aldublin-Robleto’s motion for entry of final judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2671-2680
28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680
§ 2671
28 U.S.C. § 2671

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 F. App'x 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldublin-robleto-v-fcc-ii-butner-ca4-2016.