Aldridge v. Ӕtna Life Insurance
This text of 172 A.D. 941 (Aldridge v. Ӕtna Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that it should not be held as a matter of law that the untruthful statement with reference to plaintiff’s having received medical attention is a warranty, in view of the fact that it was not contained in the copy of the application which was attached to the policy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A.D. 941, 156 N.Y.S. 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldridge-v-tna-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1916.