Aldridge v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Aldridge v. State

322 S.E.2d 750, 172 Ga. App. 251, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 3043

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 25, 1984

Docket68943

StatusPublished

This text of 322 S.E.2d 750 (Aldridge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aldridge v. State, 322 S.E.2d 750, 172 Ga. App. 251, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 3043 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Benham, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, multiple burglaries, entering an auto, and criminal damage to property and sentenced to serve three years in confinement and the balance of each sentence on probation. This appeal is from the revocation of that probation. The attorney appointed to represent appellant in the probation revocation proceeding filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, has any merit. We have therefore granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize the revocation of appellant’s probation. McBee v. State, 158 Ga. App. 662 (282 SE2d 224) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benham, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, multiple burglaries, entering an auto, and criminal damage to property and sentenced to serve three years in confinement and the balance of each sentence on probation. This appeal is from the revocation of that probation. The attorney appointed to represent appellant in the probation revocation proceeding filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, has any merit. We have therefore granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize the revocation of appellant’s probation. McBee v. State, 158 Ga. App. 662 (282 SE2d 224) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 S.E.2d 750, 172 Ga. App. 251, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 3043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldridge-v-state-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack