Aldridge v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Aldridge v. State

139 So. 119, 24 Ala. App. 582, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 12

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 1932

Docket3 Div. 696.

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 119 (Aldridge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aldridge v. State, 139 So. 119, 24 Ala. App. 582, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 12 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

RIOS, J.

The prosecution originated in the inferior court by affidavit.

It was unnecessary, the charge being a violation of the statutes pertaining to prohibited liquors, etc., to file any “complaint,” in the circuit court, to which the case had been carried by appeal. Code 1923, § 4646.

There were no exceptions reserved on the talcing of testimony, no written charges requested and refused.

There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment of conviction based thereon.

We find nowhere prejudicial error, and said judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI