Aldridge v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Aldridge v. State

89 So. 837, 18 Ala. App. 150, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 123

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 1921

Docket6 Div. 853.

StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 837 (Aldridge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aldridge v. State, 89 So. 837, 18 Ala. App. 150, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 123 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is upon the record proper. No bill of exceptions appears, and the trial judge certifies to this court that no bill of exceptions has been presented to him in this cause, and that the time for presenting same has expired. No error appears in the record. The defendant was convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition law. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, no jury trial having been demanded. The court assessed a fine of $500 against the defendant, after having adjudged him guilty, and this being within the terms of the statute, it follows that the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is upon the record proper. No bill of exceptions appears, and the trial judge certifies to this court that no bill of exceptions has been presented to him in this cause, and that the time for presenting same has expired. No error appears in the record. The defendant was convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition law. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, no jury trial having been demanded. The court assessed a fine of $500 against the defendant, after having adjudged him guilty, and this being within the terms of the statute, it follows that the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 So. 837, 18 Ala. App. 150, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldridge-v-state-alactapp-1921.