Aldridge v. Findley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Aldridge v. Findley

346 S.E.2d 69, 256 Ga. 85

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 24, 1986·No. 43588·Published

Opinion

Smith, Justice.

This case involves a petition for a writ of mandamus against appellee to compel him to sign an order in a habeas corpus hearing held on February 18, 1986.

In view of the fact that this is a direct application to this Court for a writ of mandamus, this case is controlled by Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983), the petition is therefore dis[86]*86missed.

Decided June 24, 1986. Aubrey H. Aldridge, pro se. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, for appellee.

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Justice.

This case involves a petition for a writ of mandamus against appellee to compel him to sign an order in a habeas corpus hearing held on February 18, 1986.

In view of the fact that this is a direct application to this Court for a writ of mandamus, this case is controlled by Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983), the petition is therefore dis[86]*86missed.

Decided June 24, 1986. Aubrey H. Aldridge, pro se. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, for appellee.

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Aldridge v. Findley, 346 S.E.2d 69, 256 Ga. 85 (Ga. 1986).

Pincite

346 S.E.2d 69 (Aldridge v. Findley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related