Aldrich v. Jessup
This text of 3 Grant 158 (Aldrich v. Jessup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
By the 5th section of the act of 6th March, 1778, the estate of Andrew Allen, from and after the twentieth day of April then next ensuing, was forfeited to the commonwealth, without any office or inquisition thereafter to be taken or found.
The forfeiture being complete, the pardon without words of restitution did not restore the estate, and therefore its rejection was proper.
If the record of the proceedings of the executive council had been admitted as evidence, it would not have helped the plaintiff in error. Conceding the partition to have been unauthorized, its validity cannot be questioned by a stranger after it has been acquiesced in by the parties in interest for a period of upwards of sixty years.
It would be productive of incalculable mischief to interfere now with the division of this large body of land, even upon the application of one showing title; but to do so against the wishes of the holders of the legal title, at the instance of an in-, trader, would be alike contrary to reason and law.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Grant 158, 1855 Pa. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldrich-v-jessup-pa-1855.