Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Aldrich v. Employment Division

Aldrich v. Employment Division

694 P.2d 1029, 72 Or. App. 176, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2539
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 6, 1985
Docket83-AB-1580; CA A29512
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 694 P.2d 1029 (Aldrich v. Employment Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aldrich v. Employment Division, 694 P.2d 1029, 72 Or. App. 176, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2539 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

BUTTLER, P. J.,

specially concurring.

For the reasons stated in my dissent in Cropley v. Employment Division, 72 Or App 93, 694 P2d 1025 (1985), I would reverse the decision of EAB. However, unlike in Cropley, it appears that some of the petitioners here may have joined the strike and would not be entitled to unemployment compensation. Barrier v. Employment Division, 29 Or App 387, 563 P2d 1230 (1977). Accordingly, I would remand this case for a determination limited to which petitioners, if any, joined the strike.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Members of Boilermakers Local 72 v. Employment Division
699 P.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
Cropley v. Employment Division
694 P.2d 1025 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
694 P.2d 1029, 72 Or. App. 176, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldrich-v-employment-division-orctapp-1985.