Aldrich v. Employment Division
694 P.2d 1029, 72 Or. App. 176, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2539
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 6, 1985·No. 83-AB-1580; CA A29512·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
specially concurring.
For the reasons stated in my dissent in Cropley v. Employment Division, 72 Or App 93, 694 P2d 1025 (1985), I would reverse the decision of EAB. However, unlike in Cropley, it appears that some of the petitioners here may have joined the strike and would not be entitled to unemployment compensation. Barrier v. Employment Division, 29 Or App 387, 563 P2d 1230 (1977). Accordingly, I would remand this case for a determination limited to which petitioners, if any, joined the strike.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aldrich v. Employment Division, 694 P.2d 1029, 72 Or. App. 176, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2539 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
694 P.2d 1029 (Aldrich v. Employment Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Members of Boilermakers Local 72 v. Employment Division
699 P.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
Cropley v. Employment Division
694 P.2d 1025 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)