Aldrich v. Bruss

Nebraska Supreme Court

Aldrich v. Bruss

58 N.W. 194, 39 Neb. 569, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 76

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 6, 1894

DocketNo. 5533

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 N.W. 194 (Aldrich v. Bruss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aldrich v. Bruss, 58 N.W. 194, 39 Neb. 569, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 76 (Neb. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Ryan, C.

Plaintiff in error complains that his appeal from the county court of Nance county was dismissed in the district court because the transcript was not filed within thirty days from the date of the judgment. There was probably an attempt to excuse the above failure by a showing of facts made by affidavit not incorporated in a bill of exceptions. Following the rules laid down in Maggard v. Van Duyn, 36 Neb., 862, and Barry v. Barry, 39 Neb., 521, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan, C.

Plaintiff in error complains that his appeal from the county court of Nance county was dismissed in the district court because the transcript was not filed within thirty days from the date of the judgment. There was probably an attempt to excuse the above failure by a showing of facts made by affidavit not incorporated in a bill of exceptions. Following the rules laid down in Maggard v. Van Duyn, 36 Neb., 862, and Barry v. Barry, 39 Neb., 521, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.W. 194, 39 Neb. 569, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldrich-v-bruss-neb-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack