Aldrich v. Aldrich

543 A.2d 1318, 149 Vt. 659, 1988 Vt. LEXIS 60
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided February 5, 1988·No. No. 86-390·Published

Opinion

The Rutland Superior Court found that defendant, Lloyd S. Aldrich, had a right to distribution in a trust set up by his grandfather. This was error. Upon consideration of the language creating this trust, and construing it to give effect to the grantor’s intent, Destitute of Bennington County v. Putnam Memorial Hospital, 125 Vt. 289, 293, 215 A.2d 134, 137-38 (1965), we find that, at the time of the court’s order, defendant had a vested remainder interest in the trust, subject to partial or complete defeasance: since Marion Acioly was given a life estate in the trust money, defendant had a present right of future enjoyment at the termination of her life estate, see In re Field’s Estate , 101 Vt. 242, 248, 143 A. 280, 282 (1928); W. Schwartz, Future Interests and Estate Planning § 2.10 (1965); and since the trustee had the power to distribute to Acioly trust principal as well as the income from the trust, defendant’s interest in the trust was subject to partial or complete divestment. W. Schwartz, Future Interests and Estate Planning § 2.11. Consequently, although defendant’s interest in the trust was vested, he had no present right of distribution. Id.

The death of Acioly during the pendency of this appeal terminated the life estate giving defendant a present distributable interest in both the trust principal and income. See In re Pirie Estate, 116 Vt. 159, 71 A.2d 245 (1950). Although the initial award of the trust money was improper,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aldrich v. Aldrich, 543 A.2d 1318, 149 Vt. 659, 1988 Vt. LEXIS 60 (Vt. 1988).

543 A.2d 1318 (Aldrich v. Aldrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Destitute of Bennington County v. HENRY W. PUTNAM MH
215 A.2d 134 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1965)
In Re Pirie Estate
71 A.2d 245 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1950)
In Re Field's Estate
143 A. 280 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1928)
Kennedy, Admr. v. Rutter, Admr.
6 A.2d 17 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1939)