Aldrich v. Aldrich

New York Supreme Court

Aldrich v. Aldrich

26 N.Y.S. 344, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 345

DecidedDecember 6, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 344 (Aldrich v. Aldrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aldrich v. Aldrich, 26 N.Y.S. 344, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 345 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

Orders of the kind appealed from are very largely in the discretion of the special term. From an examination of the affidavits upon which this order was granted and the pleadings in the case, it does not clearly appear to me that the special term abused the discretion vested in it, and therefore I think that the order appealed from should be affirmed. Let an order be entered accordingly, with $10 costs and printing and other disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HERRICK, J.

Orders of the kind appealed from are very largely in the discretion of the special term. From an examination of the affidavits upon which this order was granted and the pleadings in the case, it does not clearly appear to me that the special term abused the discretion vested in it, and therefore I think that the order appealed from should be affirmed. Let an order be entered accordingly, with $10 costs and printing and other disbursements. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 344, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldrich-v-aldrich-nysupct-1893.