Aldf v. Veneman
This text of Aldf v. Veneman (Aldf v. Veneman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND; ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE; VALERIE BUCHANAN; JANE GARRISON; NANCY MEGNA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 04-15788
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR D.C. No. BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, CV-03-03400-PJH Intervenor-Appellee, ORDER v. ANN M. VENEMAN; BOBBY R. ACORD; CHESTER A. GIPSON, Defendants-Appellees. Filed April 6, 2007
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
4115 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aldf v. Veneman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldf-v-veneman-ca9-2007.