Aldf v. Fda

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2016·No. 13-17131·Published

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 03 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, No. 13-17131

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:12-cv-04376-EDL Northern District of California, v. San Francisco

U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ORDER

Defendant-Appellee.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aldf v. Fda, (9th Cir. 2016).

Aldf v. Fda (Aldf v. Fda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.