Alderman v. Tyndall Federal Credit Union

656 So. 2d 583, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7081, 1995 WL 363322
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 1995
DocketNo. 94-98
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 656 So. 2d 583 (Alderman v. Tyndall Federal Credit Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alderman v. Tyndall Federal Credit Union, 656 So. 2d 583, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7081, 1995 WL 363322 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s decision comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correct[584]*584ness, and the burden was upon appellants to demonstrate error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). A transcript of the trial proceedings was not furnished to this court nor did appellants submit a stipulated statement of the evidence. See Rule 9.200(b)(4) and (e), Fla. R.App.P. Under the circumstances, appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error, and we AFFIRM.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cirillo v. Davis
732 So. 2d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
656 So. 2d 583, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7081, 1995 WL 363322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alderman-v-tyndall-federal-credit-union-fladistctapp-1995.