Alderman v. Tyndall Federal Credit Union
656 So. 2d 583, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7081, 1995 WL 363322
Opinion
The trial court’s decision comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correct[584] ness, and the burden was upon appellants to demonstrate error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). A transcript of the trial proceedings was not furnished to this court nor did appellants submit a stipulated statement of the evidence. See Rule 9.200(b)(4) and (e), Fla. R.App.P. Under the circumstances, appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error, and we AFFIRM.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alderman v. Tyndall Federal Credit Union, 656 So. 2d 583, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7081, 1995 WL 363322 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
656 So. 2d 583 (Alderman v. Tyndall Federal Credit Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cirillo v. Davis
732 So. 2d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)