Alderman v. Tyndall Federal Credit Union
This text of 656 So. 2d 583 (Alderman v. Tyndall Federal Credit Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court’s decision comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correct[584]*584ness, and the burden was upon appellants to demonstrate error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). A transcript of the trial proceedings was not furnished to this court nor did appellants submit a stipulated statement of the evidence. See Rule 9.200(b)(4) and (e), Fla. R.App.P. Under the circumstances, appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error, and we AFFIRM.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
656 So. 2d 583, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7081, 1995 WL 363322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alderman-v-tyndall-federal-credit-union-fladistctapp-1995.