Alderman v. State
417 So. 2d 699, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20430
Opinion
Appellant Alderman’s single general sentence for two separate offenses is improper, Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977), and is therefore vacated and remanded to the trial court with directions to enter a separate sentence for each offense. Appellant need not be present at resentencing.
Appellant’s remaining arguments being without merit, the judgment and sentence is otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alderman v. State, 417 So. 2d 699, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20430 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
417 So. 2d 699 (Alderman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dorfman v. State
351 So. 2d 954 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)