Alderman v. Jones Robinson
This text of 21 S.W. 298 (Alderman v. Jones Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit originated in the Justice Court for precinct number 1, Wilbarger County, in which judgment was rendered in favor of appellees against appellant on‘the 30th day of Septem *337 ber, 1891. Appellant undertook to appeal to the County Court from this judgment, and in his appeal bond described the judgment as having been rendered on the 28th day of September instead of the 30th, the correct date. In the County Court appellees moved to dismiss this appeal on account of this misdescription of the judgment, which motion was sustained by the court below and the appeal dismissed, from which this appeal is prosecuted.
The appeal bond correctly described the judgment rendered in the Justice Court by the number of the case, names of the parties, the court in which it was rendered, and the amount of the judgment, the only misdescription being in the date above set forth.
The decisions of our Supreme Court in the case of Railway v. Stanley, 76 Texas, 418, and of our Court of Appeals in Edwards v. Allen, 17 S. W. Rep., 1074, are conclusive that the action of the court below was erroneous, for which the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Delivered February 7, 1893.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 S.W. 298, 2 Tex. Civ. App. 336, 1893 Tex. App. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alderman-v-jones-robinson-texapp-1893.