Alderman v. Eastern Railroad

115 Mass. 233, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 194
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 18, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 115 Mass. 233 (Alderman v. Eastern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alderman v. Eastern Railroad, 115 Mass. 233, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 194 (Mass. 1874).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

This case cannot be distinguished from that of Newcomb v. Boston f Lowell Railroad, ante, 230, in any particular favorable to the defendant. The bill of lading, with the draft attached to it, was transmitted to the bank with directions to indorse the bill of lading to Chandler & Co. upon the payment of the draft. As soon as Chandler & Co. paid the draft and obtained the bill of lading from the bank, they immediately indorsed the latter to the plaintiffs as security for the money advanced by them to pay the draft, and a property in the goods thereby vested in the plaintiffs. The sale and delivery of the goods by Chandler & Co. to Beckford & Dodge passed no title as against the plaintiffs ; because at the time of the sale Chandler & Co. had acquired none, and at the time of the delivery the plaintiffs’ title had already vested. The only evidence which the defendant had of any title in the goods was that furnished by the way bill, that they belonged to the consignors. The delivery by the defendant to Beckford & Dodge was therefore a conversion of the property, for which it is responsible to the plaintiffs as rightful owners of the goods. Judgment for the plaintiff».

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank Adam Co. v. Orpheum Theatre Co.
193 S.W. 908 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1917)
South Deerfield Onion Storage Co. v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
222 Mass. 535 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Third National Bank of St. Louis v. Hays
119 Tenn. 729 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1907)
Wright & Colton Wire Cloth Co. v. Warren
58 N.E. 1082 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Hopkins v. Cowen
47 L.R.A. 124 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1899)
Kentucky Refining Co. v. Globe Refining Co.
47 S.W. 602 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1898)
Colgate v. Pennsylvania Co.
38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 297 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)
Forbes v. Boston and Lowell Railroad
133 Mass. 154 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)
Wigton v. Bowley
130 Mass. 252 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)
Libby v. Ingalls
124 Mass. 503 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 Mass. 233, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alderman-v-eastern-railroad-mass-1874.