Alderman v. City of Valdosta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Alderman v. City of Valdosta

148 S.E. 169, 39 Ga. App. 634, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 475

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 13, 1929

Docket19505

StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.E. 169 (Alderman v. City of Valdosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alderman v. City of Valdosta, 148 S.E. 169, 39 Ga. App. 634, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 475 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. ¿T.

1. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied. The ruling in Delk v. Pickens, 92 Ga. 576 (17 S. E. 862), will not be extended to cover the facts of the instant case.

2. The evidence was insufficient to authorize the judgment of the recorder, and the overruling of the certiorari was error. This case is differentiated by its particular facts from the cases cited in the brief of counsel for the defendant in error. As this ruling is controlling in the case, the special assignment of error (ground 2) in the petition for certiorari, in which error is assigned on the admission of testimony as to the character of the accused is not passed upon. Judgment reversed■

Luhe and Bhodworih, JJ., concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. ¿T.

1. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied. The ruling in Delk v. Pickens, 92 Ga. 576 (17 S. E. 862), will not be extended to cover the facts of the instant case.

2. The evidence was insufficient to authorize the judgment of the recorder, and the overruling of the certiorari was error. This case is differentiated by its particular facts from the cases cited in the brief of counsel for the defendant in error. As this ruling is controlling in the case, the special assignment of error (ground 2) in the petition for certiorari, in which error is assigned on the admission of testimony as to the character of the accused is not passed upon. Judgment reversed■

Luhe and Bhodworih, JJ., concur,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 S.E. 169, 39 Ga. App. 634, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alderman-v-city-of-valdosta-gactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack