Alderman v. Alderman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Alderman v. Alderman

81 S.E. 899, 141 Ga. 600, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 65

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 23, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 S.E. 899 (Alderman v. Alderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alderman v. Alderman, 81 S.E. 899, 141 Ga. 600, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 65 (Ga. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

Where certain plaintiffs brought an action to recover land against two defendants, and pending the case, upon discovering that one of the defendants had made a deed to the other for a certain part of the land prior to the filing of the suit, the plaintiffs dismissed the action as to the grantee in such deed and proceeded only against the grantor as to a part of the land, the judgment rendered in such case could not successfully be pleaded as res adjudicaba in a subsequent action brought by the same plaintiffs against the defendant who had been dismissed from the.prior action. Garrard v. Hull, 92 Ga. 787 (20 S. E. 357). See also, Ruker v. Womack, 55 Ga. 399; Elwell v. New England Mortgage Co., 101 Ga. 496 (28 S. E. 833); Marshall v. Charland, 106 Ga. 42 (31 S. E. 791).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

Where certain plaintiffs brought an action to recover land against two defendants, and pending the case, upon discovering that one of the defendants had made a deed to the other for a certain part of the land prior to the filing of the suit, the plaintiffs dismissed the action as to the grantee in such deed and proceeded only against the grantor as to a part of the land, the judgment rendered in such case could not successfully be pleaded as res adjudicaba in a subsequent action brought by the same plaintiffs against the defendant who had been dismissed from the.prior action. Garrard v. Hull, 92 Ga. 787 (20 S. E. 357). See also, Ruker v. Womack, 55 Ga. 399; Elwell v. New England Mortgage Co., 101 Ga. 496 (28 S. E. 833); Marshall v. Charland, 106 Ga. 42 (31 S. E. 791).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.E. 899, 141 Ga. 600, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alderman-v-alderman-ga-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack