Alden v. Lee

1 Yeates 207
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 15, 1793
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Yeates 207 (Alden v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alden v. Lee, 1 Yeates 207 (Pa. 1793).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This case cannot be resembled with propriety to the usual cases of proceedings being reversed on writs of error at common law. It partakes more of the nature of proceedings on forcible entry and detainer. Though a judgment has been pronounced, yet we may stop execution on equitable grounds being laid before us, in a variety of instances.

We adhere to our former opinion, that it rests in our discretion to award restitution, and that we are not bound ex debito justitice to award it.

Under all the circumstances which have appeared to us, we cannot think that the plaintiff in error is entitled to restitution from the grace of the court.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Com. ex rel. Meconkey v. Rogers
1 Brightly 450 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Yeates 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alden-v-lee-pa-1793.