Alden v. City of Springfield
This text of 121 Mass. 27 (Alden v. City of Springfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While the petitioner was entitled to introduce evidence tending to show that the assessment upon his land was too great, he was not entitled to inquire as to the proportion of the benefit to the lands of himself and the other abutters on the way, as compared with the benefit to real estate generally [28]*28in the city; and such an inquiry might properly he excluded as tending to confuse the jury, and to divert their attention from the issue before them.
The question was as to the benefit to the petitioner’s land by the whole construction of the street, and the petitioner had no right to introduce evidence as to the benefit resulting from any particular piece of work done in the course of such construction.
Exceptions overruled
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 Mass. 27, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alden-v-city-of-springfield-mass-1875.