Aldeen v. Industrial Appeals Board

82 A.D.3d 1220, 919 N.Y.2d 381
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 29, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 82 A.D.3d 1220 (Aldeen v. Industrial Appeals Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aldeen v. Industrial Appeals Board, 82 A.D.3d 1220, 919 N.Y.2d 381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[1221]*1221The determination by the State of New York Industrial Board of Appeals (hereinafter the IBA) affirming two orders of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor which determined that the petitioners violated Labor Law article 19 by underpaying employees, and Labor Law article 6 by failing to keep payroll records and provide wage statements, is supported by substantial evidence (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179 [1978]; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 230 [1974]). There is no merit to the petitioners’ contention that the IBA’s determination is unsupported by substantial evidence because it is based on hearsay (see Matter of Hughes v New York State Unified Ct. Sys., Off. of Ct. Admin., 78 AD3d 700 [2010]; Matter of Price v Property Clerk of N.Y. City Police Dept., 74 AD3d 1078, 1080 [2010]; Matter of Lumsden v New York City Fire Dept., 134 AD2d 595, 596 [1987]). Contrary to the petitioners’ contentions, the calculation of underpayments, for some employees, correctly included overtime at a “regular rate” (12 NYCRR 142-2.2), and a “spread of hours” bonus (12 NYCRR 142-2.4, 142-2.18). There is no merit to the petitioners’ claim that the civil penalties were imposed in violation of Labor Law § 218 (1). Florio, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Baudo v. New York State Indus. Bd. of Appeals
2017 NY Slip Op 7304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Labor
110 A.D.3d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 1220, 919 N.Y.2d 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldeen-v-industrial-appeals-board-nyappdiv-2011.