Aldana v. 21st Century Insurance Company

D. Nevada

Aldana v. 21st Century Insurance Company

DecidedOctober 27, 2023

Docket2:23-cv-01574

StatusUnknown

This text of Aldana v. 21st Century Insurance Company (Aldana v. 21st Century Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aldana v. 21st Century Insurance Company, (D. Nev. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5

6 CARLOS ALDANA, Case No. 2:23-cv-01574-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff, Order 8 v. 9 21st CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, 10 Defendants. 11 12 This case was removed to this Court on diversity grounds. See Docket No. 1. The Court 13 previously ordered Plaintiff to file an amended certificate of interested parties to fully the identify 14 citizenship attributed to him. See Docket No. 9. To date, Plaintiff fails to fully identify his 15 citizenship for the purpose of diversity jurisdiction. See Docket Nos. 8, 11. 16 The Court expects parties practicing before it to practice competently. To assist federal 17 courts in ensuring that diversity jurisdiction exists, the disclosure statement filed by each party 18 “must name—and identify the citizenship of—every individual or entity whose citizenship is 19 attributed to that party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2).1 “An individual is a citizen of the state in which 20 he is domiciled; domicile is determined by an individual’s 1) residence in a state, and 2) his intent 21 to remain indefinitely.” Boon v. Allstate Ins. Co., 229 F.Supp.2d 1016, 1019 (C.D. Cal. 2002) 22 (citing Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 2001)). Here, Plaintiff’s 23 amended certificate of interested parties fails to fully identify the citizenship attributed to him. See 24 Docket No. 11. 25 26 27

28 1 This federal rule became effective on December 1, 2022. ] Accordingly, Plaintiff must file an amended certificate of interested parties by November 3, 2023, fully identifying the citizenship attributed to him. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 3] THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: October 27, 2023 a hen

7 Unite States □ istrate Judge es Magi g 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5

6 CARLOS ALDANA, Case No. 2:23-cv-01574-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff, Order 8 v. 9 21st CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, 10 Defendants. 11 12 This case was removed to this Court on diversity grounds. See Docket No. 1. The Court 13 previously ordered Plaintiff to file an amended certificate of interested parties to fully the identify 14 citizenship attributed to him. See Docket No. 9. To date, Plaintiff fails to fully identify his 15 citizenship for the purpose of diversity jurisdiction. See Docket Nos. 8, 11. 16 The Court expects parties practicing before it to practice competently. To assist federal 17 courts in ensuring that diversity jurisdiction exists, the disclosure statement filed by each party 18 “must name—and identify the citizenship of—every individual or entity whose citizenship is 19 attributed to that party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2).1 “An individual is a citizen of the state in which 20 he is domiciled; domicile is determined by an individual’s 1) residence in a state, and 2) his intent 21 to remain indefinitely.” Boon v. Allstate Ins. Co., 229 F.Supp.2d 1016, 1019 (C.D. Cal. 2002) 22 (citing Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 2001)). Here, Plaintiff’s 23 amended certificate of interested parties fails to fully identify the citizenship attributed to him. See 24 Docket No. 11. 25 26 27

28 1 This federal rule became effective on December 1, 2022. ] Accordingly, Plaintiff must file an amended certificate of interested parties by November 3, 2023, fully identifying the citizenship attributed to him. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 3] THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: October 27, 2023 a hen

7 Unite States □ istrate Judge es Magi g 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Aldana v. 21st Century Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldana-v-21st-century-insurance-company-nvd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack