Aldan v. Guidry

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 16, 2023·No. SCPW-23-0000488·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 16-OCT-2023 09:49 AM Dkt. 24 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

MIKA ALDAN also known as MIKA TAN, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY, Associate Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX; 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX; CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Cataldo and Circuit Judge Hamman, assigned by reason of vacancies)

Upon consideration of the August 21, 2023, August 25, 2023,

and September 21, 2023 submissions from Petitioner Mika Aldan

also known as Mika Tan, filed with this court as a petition for

a writ of mandamus, and the record in 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX, 1CPC-21-

0000816, and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, we conclude the petitioner is

neither Sean Aldan’s counsel nor a party to the underlying cases and further that she fails to demonstrate a clear and

indisputable right to relief. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate

Procedure Rule 21(a); Straub Clinic & Hospital v. Kochi, 81

Hawaiʻi 410, 414, 917 P.2d 1284, 1288 (1996). Therefore,

It is ordered that the petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 16, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa W. Cataldo

/s/ Kirstin M. Hamman

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aldan v. Guidry, (haw 2023).

Aldan v. Guidry (Aldan v. Guidry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Straub Clinic & Hospital v. Kochi
917 P.2d 1284 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1996)