Aldama v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Aldama v. State

400 So. 2d 34, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19853

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 19, 1981

DocketNo. 80-972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 400 So. 2d 34 (Aldama v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aldama v. State, 400 So. 2d 34, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19853 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments of conviction upon a holding that (1) notwithstanding the defendants’ claim that the witnesses called by the State at the suppression hearing were in hopeless conflict and were inherently incredible, no error is shown where the trial court’s findings of fact, from which flowed the unassailed and unassailable conclusion of law that the search was valid, were supported by substantial competent evidence, Boykin v. State, 309 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); and (2) the defendants’ motion to dismiss the information because signed by an Assistant State Attorney was properly denied, see State v. Rivero, 400 So.2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments of conviction upon a holding that (1) notwithstanding the defendants’ claim that the witnesses called by the State at the suppression hearing were in hopeless conflict and were inherently incredible, no error is shown where the trial court’s findings of fact, from which flowed the unassailed and unassailable conclusion of law that the search was valid, were supported by substantial competent evidence, Boykin v. State, 309 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); and (2) the defendants’ motion to dismiss the information because signed by an Assistant State Attorney was properly denied, see State v. Rivero, 400 So.2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

400 So. 2d 34, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldama-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack