Aldama v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
This text of 194 So. 3d 543 (Aldama v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm all aspects of the final judgment of foreclosure except for the award of attorney’s fees to the appellees, which the appellees have commendably conceded on appeal was unsupported by the record. See Palmetto Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Day, 512 So.2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (reversing the award of attorney’s fees based on the failure to provide expert testimony regarding the reasonableness of the claimed fees). We, therefore, reverse the award of attorney’s fees and remand to the trial court to issue a corrected judgment.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for the entry of a corrected judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 So. 3d 543, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555, 2016 WL 3421216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldama-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-na-fladistctapp-2016.