Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 2016·No. 15-0368·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 22, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-368 Lower Tribunal No. 13-12931 ________________

Pedro R. Aldama and Olga L. Aldama, Appellants,

vs.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Marin, Judge.

Ice Appellate, and Thomas Erskine Ice (Royal Palm Beach), for appellants.

Lender Legal Services, LLC, and Thomas Wade Young and Joseph B. Towne (Orlando), for appellee Christiana Trust.

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and ROTHENBERG and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM. We affirm all aspects of the final judgment of foreclosure except for the

award of attorney’s fees to the appellees, which the appellees have commendably

conceded on appeal was unsupported by the record. See Palmetto Fed. Sav. &

Loan Ass’n v. Day, 512 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (reversing the award of

attorney’s fees based on the failure to provide expert testimony regarding the

reasonableness of the claimed fees). We, therefore, reverse the award of

attorney’s fees and remand to the trial court to issue a corrected judgment.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for the entry of a corrected

judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank (Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palmetto Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Day
512 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)