Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank
This text of Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank (Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 22, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D15-368 Lower Tribunal No. 13-12931 ________________
Pedro R. Aldama and Olga L. Aldama, Appellants,
vs.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Marin, Judge.
Ice Appellate, and Thomas Erskine Ice (Royal Palm Beach), for appellants.
Lender Legal Services, LLC, and Thomas Wade Young and Joseph B. Towne (Orlando), for appellee Christiana Trust.
Before SUAREZ, C.J., and ROTHENBERG and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM. We affirm all aspects of the final judgment of foreclosure except for the
award of attorney’s fees to the appellees, which the appellees have commendably
conceded on appeal was unsupported by the record. See Palmetto Fed. Sav. &
Loan Ass’n v. Day, 512 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (reversing the award of
attorney’s fees based on the failure to provide expert testimony regarding the
reasonableness of the claimed fees). We, therefore, reverse the award of
attorney’s fees and remand to the trial court to issue a corrected judgment.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for the entry of a corrected
judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aldama v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aldama-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-fladistctapp-2016.