Alcove Investment, Inc. v. Conceicao (In re Conceicao)
This text of 199 F. App'x 615 (Alcove Investment, Inc. v. Conceicao (In re Conceicao)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alcove Investment, Inc. appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting a preliminary injunction to stop the judicial sale of the home of debtors Marco and Brenda Conceicao (“Debtors”). We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
This court has jurisdiction to review appeals arising from final decisions, judgments, and orders of the BAP. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). The BAP’s affirmance of a bankruptcy court’s interlocutory order is not a final order under section 158(d). See In re Lievsay, 118 F.3d 661, 662-63 (9th Cir.1997). Here, the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s interlocutory order granting Debtors’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review this appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 F. App'x 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alcove-investment-inc-v-conceicao-in-re-conceicao-ca9-2006.