Alcorn v. Smith

Sixth Circuit

Alcorn v. Smith

740 F.2d 3

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedAugust 3, 1984

DocketNo. 82-5623

StatusPublished

This text of 740 F.2d 3 (Alcorn v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alcorn v. Smith, 740 F.2d 3 (6th Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before the panel is the Respondent-Appellee’s Petition for Rehearing.

The petition challenges the statement that the respondent did not raise the exhaustion of state remedies issue in reference to the discussion of cause and prejudice for petitioner’s procedural default. This statement is accurate. Moreover, if it were not accurate, it would in no way affect disposition of this case.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before the panel is the Respondent-Appellee’s Petition for Rehearing.

The petition challenges the statement that the respondent did not raise the exhaustion of state remedies issue in reference to the discussion of cause and prejudice for petitioner’s procedural default. This statement is accurate. Moreover, if it were not accurate, it would in no way affect disposition of this case.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

740 F.2d 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alcorn-v-smith-ca6-1984.