Alcorn v. Brandeman
This text of 158 Cal. 410 (Alcorn v. Brandeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendant and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. This action was brought to quiet title to a tract of land in San Joaquin County, and involves the validity of a conveyance made by one Kyle as attorney in fact for plaintiffs and one Sebree to Olive A. Jennings, under whom defendant claims.
This appeal presents practically the same questions as are involved in the case of Alcorn v. Gieseke (Sac. No. 1693), ante, p. 396, [111 Pac. 98], this day decided, affirming the judgment and order of the trial court. The defendants in both cases claim under Jennings to two separate portions of a larger tract conveyed to her by the deed whose validity is involved, and on the authority of Alcorn v. Gieseke, the judgment and order in the present appeal are affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 Cal. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alcorn-v-brandeman-cal-1910.