Alcock v. Mead

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 898
CourtNew York County Court, Suffolk County
DecidedApril 30, 1678
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 898 (Alcock v. Mead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Suffolk County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alcock v. Mead, 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 898 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1678).

Opinion

Sarah Alcocke the Relict widdow of mr Samll Alcocke Physitian deced plaint. agt Richard Mead Senr of Roxbury Deft in an action of the case for witholding from the sd Sarah possession of the house where the said Mead now dwells and the Lands thereto appertaining &c. together with all other Lands belonging or appertaining to the sd Alcock lying & scituate in Roxbury and now in the possession of the sd Mead & all due damages &c. according to Attachmt. . . . The Jury . . . found for the Defendt costs of Court: The plaint. appeald from this Judgemt unto the next Court of Assistants & put in Security for the prosecution thereof to Effect.

[ Copy of Alcock’s Will and Sarah’s Reasons of Appeal in S. F. 1721.1, 2. She withdrew her action before it came to trial at the Court of Assistants.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Rec. Co. Ct. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alcock-v-mead-nysuffolkctyct-1678.