Alcock v. Giberton

5 Duer 76
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided October 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

We concur in the decision of the Judge at Special Term overruling the demurrer, and giving judgment for the plaintiff. We consider that he is clearly right in the first point stated in his opinion, viz., That the covenant not to use the secret mode of conducting the business, or manufacturing the teeth, was valid in itself. We do not find it necessary to consider the other important question raised by the learned Judge, as to the effect of a union in the same instrument, of a covenant prohibited by law, or against public policy, with another of a perfectly valid character, and express, therefore, no opinion upon it.

Order affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alcock v. Giberton, 5 Duer 76 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

5 Duer 76 (Alcock v. Giberton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Gum & Mica Co. v. Braendly
27 A.D. 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Mandeville v. Harman
42 N.J. Eq. 185 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1886)
Mackinnon Pen Co. v. Fountain Ink Co.
16 Jones & S. 442 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1882)
Arnot v. Pittston & Elmira Coal Co.
5 Thomp. & Cook 143 (New York Supreme Court, 1874)
Hard v. Seeley
47 Barb. 428 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)