Alcesia Srl v. International Trade Commission
This text of Alcesia Srl v. International Trade Commission (Alcesia Srl v. International Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ALCESIA SRL, Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,
and
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., Intervenor. ____________________
2010-1156 ______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-643. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
WILLIAM ZEITLER, Law Offices of William Zeitler, of McLean, Virginia, argued for the appellant.
DANIEL E. VALENCIA, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for the appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel, and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.
KENNETH L. CHERNOF, Arnold & Porter, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the intervenor. With him on the brief was CARL S. NADLER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 24, 2011 _____ /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alcesia Srl v. International Trade Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alcesia-srl-v-international-trade-commission-cafc-2011.