ALCE v. State
This text of 965 So. 2d 1275 (ALCE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richie ALCE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David S. Morgan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Akins v. State, 838 So.2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (holding that eyewitness testimony was legally sufficient to convict a defendant carrying a firearm even though the firearm was never recovered), and Crump v. State, 629 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (accord).
GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
965 So. 2d 1275, 2007 WL 2962600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alce-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.