Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc.
Opinion
1 2 3 6 7 JUAN ALCAZAR, Case No. 20-cv-01434-JST 8 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER 9 Vv. TO SHOW CAUSE ll Defendant. 12
13 A case management conference was scheduled for today at 2:00 p.m. ECF No. 34. When 14 Defendant’s counsel did not appear, the Courtroom Deputy emailed the attorney of record. She 3 15 || reached an “out of office” outgoing email message that directed her to another attorney. When she a 16 || emailed the second attorney, she received another “out of office” outgoing email message. The 3 17 || case management conference did not proceed as scheduled. A further case management 18 conference is now scheduled for June 15, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. An updated case management 19 statement is not required. 20 At the same date and time, Defendant and its counsel are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE 21 why monetary sanctions should not be imposed against them. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 22 447 U.S. 752, 764-67 (1980) (federal courts have inherent power to impose monetary sanctions for 23 willful disobedience of a court order after a litigant has been given notice and an opportunity to be 24 heard). A written response to this order to show cause is due by May 25, 2021. 26 Dated: May 18, 2021 . 27 JON S. TIGAR 28 nited States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc. (Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.